An analysis of the argument for and against gay marriage

Well, you got the question right the first time. Gay people need all the same safety.

An analysis of the argument for and against gay marriage

By Paul HitlinMark Jurkowitz and Amy Mitchell In a period marked by Supreme Court deliberations on the subject, the news media coverage provided a strong sense of momentum towards legalizing same-sex marriage, according to a new study by the Pew Research Center.

Stories with more statements supporting same-sex marriage outweighed those with more statements opposing it by a margin of roughly 5-to In the coverage studied, the central argument among proponents of same-sex marriage was one of civil rights.

Arguments against were more varied, but most often voiced the idea that same-sex marriage would hurt society and the institution of traditional marriage.

An analysis of the argument for and against gay marriage

In order for a story to be classified as supporting or opposing same sex marriage, statements expressing that position had to outnumber the opposite view by at least 2-to Stories that did not meet that threshold were defined as neutral or mixed. Many of the events themselves during the period studied, such as announcements by politicians and state legislation, reflected movement towards same-sex marriage.

All three of the major cable networks, for instance, had more stories with significantly more supportive statements than opposing, including Fox News.

In addition to the main set of news media, this study also examined same-sex marriage coverage in three other media segments: Twitter postings on the subject were nearly evenly split between support and opposition for the measure, aligning much more closely with public opinion than with the news media.

Coverage on the Huffington Post, on the other hand, was even more tilted towards support of same-sex marriage than the rest of the news media. Within the media debate on the subject, this report found that those arguing for same-sex marriage had a more consistent message than those arguing against.

Among supporters of same-sex marriage, the main argument was framed around civil rights. The arguments against tended to vary more.

Hollingsworth v. Perry - Wikipedia

Other arguments against the measure included the idea that homosexuality is immoral and that the government should not impose a new definition of marriage that strays from the traditional notion of one man and one woman. These are among the key findings from a new study of more than 1, stories and more than 2.

The main news sample includes a mix of six websites from Politico to Buzzfeed to Gawker, 11 newspapers, news programs from the three main network news outlets along with PBS, and a mix of programs on the three cable television channels, talk radio, NPR and syndicated radio headlines.

Researchers also examined and separately analyzed coverage on the Huffington Post, coverage across a mix of leading LGBT news publications and the tone of the discussion on Twitter.

For newspapers, the LexisNexis database does not include wire copy or syndicated columns, but coding of a random sample of wire stories during this period produced findings very similar to the newspaper numbers overall. See the full methodology for details.

Among other findings in the study: Most of the attention to the subject came in the five days surrounding the Supreme Court hearings March 25 — The LGBT outlets, on the other hand, were somewhat more consistent in the amount of attention devoted to the subject throughout the eight weeks studied.

In addition to the main arguments for and against the issue, the notion that the Supreme Court should not have taken up gay marriage was a common theme.

In most instances, this case was made by legal scholars and the Supreme Court justices themselves as they wrestled with the legal questions.

Hollingsworth v. Perry - Wikipedia

On a few occasions, however, the argument was used by opponents of same-sex marriage. Despite the preponderance of supportive coverage across media sectors, the level of mixed or neutral coverage varied among individual outlets.

While expressing strong support for the measure, LGBT news outlets focused on a different element of the story than any of the other media studied.

Generally, those stories detailed developments in marriage legislation on the state level.There’s a difference between trying to negotiate on T-bills, which is ridiculous and unworkable, and prosecuting women who get abortions/encouraging reprisals against innocent civilians/censoring communications/using the courts to beat down your opponents, most of which have been hugely effective tactics for establishing political .

Philosophy of Sexuality. Among the many topics explored by the philosophy of sexuality are procreation, contraception, celibacy, marriage, adultery, casual sex. A comprehensive, coeducational Catholic High school Diocese of Wollongong - Albion Park Act Justly, love tenderly and walk humbly with your God Micah No.

1] What is Marriage? they can control the color of their skin.6 In both cases, they ar‐ gue, there is no rational basis for treating relationships differ‐ ently, because the freedom to marry the person one loves is a.

On June 26, , the US Supreme Court ruled that gay marriage is a right protected by the US Constitution in all 50 states. Prior to their decision, same-sex marriage was already legal in 37 states and Washington DC, but was banned in the remaining The court rejected the argument made during the April 25 oral hearing by Richard Marsh, Western Jurisdiction counsel, that Oliveto’s same-sex marriage to Robin Ridenour in was not a public statement about her sexual practices.

“A same-sex marriage license issued by competent civil authorities together with the clergy person’s status in .

An Argument For Same-Sex Marriage: An Interview with Jonathan Rauch | Pew Research Center